Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 6/30/2014 10:57 AM, Alan Baker wrote:

Alan Baker
On 2014-06-30 11:05:08 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 6/30/2014 2:15 AM, Alan Baker wrote:

Alan Baker
On 2014-06-29 14:29:58 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 6/29/2014 12:21 AM, Alan Baker wrote:

Alan Baker
On 2014-06-29 03:49:20 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 6/28/2014 5:26 PM, -hh wrote:

-hh
Alan Baker wrote:

Alan Baker
Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Yes there was. The need to be able to actually view streaming content in a more immersive manner than the teeny weeny iphone screen allowed.....

Alan Baker
You think that it takes a lot of imagination to realize that a larger screen will give a better viewing experience? [many LOLs follow]

-hh
Maybe they should come out with a huge screen device then...maybe call it an 'iPad'.

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
riiiiiiiiiiight. Try sticking an iPad in your pocket.....

Alan Baker
Try doing the same with some phablets...

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Yeah, I suppose if you're going to try stuffing an ipad mini or a Samsung Glaxy Note 8 in a pocket, you'd have difficulty, but then those aren't true 'phablets. Any phablets >designed< as such generally do fit in pockets however. My 5.7" screen Note III is one of the largest phablets out there, and it fits in my shirt or coat pocket just fine.

Alan Baker
"No true Scotsman" fallacy.

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
You really are an *idiot*. You don't even know what a 'no true scptsman' fallacy is. What? Did you just get a bazooka joe gum wrapperwith 'no true scotsman fallacy' on it, and now just love to hear yourself use your new $10 phrase?

'duh, ooooh geeeee! no true sotsman fall-uh-seeee....duh, oi geeeeee!"

Alan Baker
'When faced with a counterexample to a universal claim ("no Scotsman would do such a thing"), rather than denying the counterexample or rejecting the original universal claim, this fallacy modifies the subject of the assertion to exclude the specific case or others like it by rhetoric, without reference to any specific objective rule ("no true Scotsman would do such a thing"),[2] creating an implied tautology. It can also be used to create unnecessary requirements by adding "true" or "real" to the subject.'

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Vwery good, you've pasted a Wiki definition which doen't apply.

What 'fallacy' did I assert or "exclude a specific case or others like it by rhetoric, without reference to any specific objective rule", or create an implied tautology, or create an unnecessary requirement by adding true or real to the subject?

duh. Oi geeee!

Alan Baker
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman>