Skip to main content
news

Re: Google Copying Apple......

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
SubjectRe: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung
FromHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Date07/01/2014 02:28 (06/30/2014 20:28)
Message-ID<losvb7$559$1@dont-email.me>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsAlan Baker
FollowupsAlan Baker (1m) > Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
KDT (2h & 36m) > Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy

On 6/30/2014 8:20 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

Alan Baker
On 2014-07-01 00:18:52 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 6/30/2014 8:07 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

Apple Fan Not
On 2014-07-01 00:06:41 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

On 6/30/2014 7:58 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

On 2014-06-30 23:56:14 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

On 6/30/2014 7:29 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

On 2014-06-30 23:24:32 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

On 6/30/2014 6:57 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

On 2014-06-30 22:55:23 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

On 6/30/2014 6:01 PM, KDT wrote:

And how did I exclude the Galaxy note 8? I said it was not a

phablet<, not that it wasn't a phone.

----- Well *you* can define it however you wish but every majors review site is calling it a phablet.

If only because Samsung mistakenly coopted the term for a

tablet<

of theirs....

Sorry, but you appear to be saying that you get to decide what Samsung calls its products...

no, but I do get to >reject< them as phablets....

No, Fanboy. You don't.

Actually, I do. It's *my* money and I can vote against them and reject them as phablets by not spending it on one of your tablet phones....

No, Fanboy: you don't get to define what terms in common usage mean.

And dhow me ONE time where Apple refers to an ipad mini w/a VOIP app as a 'phablet'. Betchya can't....

And now you've switched to another dodge.

You not BUYING something is not rejecting them AS phablets.

Yes it is.....

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Not a dodge. You're evasion in asnswering my challenge is the actual dodge. This whole thing about what constitutes a phablet arose over you and KDT stubbornly constantly conflating phones with phablets.

Alan Baker
No, actually. It came from YOU claiming that all phablets could fit in pants pockets and the post declaring that any phablet that didn't wasn't a "true phablet".

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
So therefore, I CHALLENGE you to provide a cite where Apple refers to an iPad mini w/a voip as a 'phablet' (or even specifically as a 'phone').

Alan Baker
I never claimed the iPad is a phablet.

but you're defending it as a valid exception that qualifies it as a phablet. This was what KDT specifically claimed and you chimed in in agreement way back a few threads ago.

Back up your assertion. or consider your petulance utterly destroyed...

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
What? Got no hair on yer balls? Try plucking a few from your asshole, Anal, and gluing them on yer nuts...

Alan Baker
And we've gone in to full dodge mode!

blah, blah, no true scotsman...blah, blah...'dodge' this, 'dodge 'that...blah, blah, blah...

-- my favorite company is *anybody* BUT >Apple<!