Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
From | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
Date | 07/02/2014 02:00 (07/01/2014 20:00) |
Message-ID | <lovi30$32h$1@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | -hh |
Followups | -hh (1h & 42m) > Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
-hhOh riiiight. Like you can see what I see on my screen. This is exactly why I'm beginning not to give a rat's ass what you think. Between all the rush to judgenments, impguning motives, and your stuffed shirt stodginess, I grow tired of your nonsense.
Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy wrote:Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy-hh
-hh wrote:-hh
Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy wrote:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy-hh
...aside from that, there'll be no apologies, because you apple fangurls don't know how to accept an admission of error or apologies gracefully....
So in other words, because you're _afraid_ that no one else will ever apologize for errors (even though I just apologized yesterday to Lloyd),
What do you want?
Oh, I've already achieved what I want.Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy-hh
A brownie point for something I never even read.
Well that's clearly an untruth, given the anger which follows.
You have a way of totally ignoring an apology already given and coming back with yet another stodgey reply. Fuck you....Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Forget it. I apologized for calling you habeeeb, If that wasn't fucking good enough, _too_bad_.-hh
you're going to refuse to be accountable for your own actions. How ... Classy!
Like it's your job to oversee what I overlook and do not.Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy-hh
Thank you...
What's to apologize for? Lemme guess, this is an exercize on our part in order to forcably extraxt an apology for a non-offense.
Not at all: the point was simply to make sure that you wouldn't "accidentally" overlook for a second (or third) time how your claims were being factually corrected.
-hhFuck you hh....