Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
From | Alan Baker |
Date | 07/08/2014 07:57 (07/07/2014 22:57) |
Message-ID | <lpg182$l9l$1@news.datemas.de> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyStill waiting for your sources that add up to "generally considered".
On 7/7/2014 11:37 AM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 2014-07-07 14:01:52 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:
Since you've run away from everything posted above this, I'll snip it out for brevity.
:-)Alan BakerAlan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan BakerBut I'm guessing that right about now, you'll start shifting the goalposts and adding yet another constraint on your definition.Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
:-)
Nope. the Note 8 has a screen size that exceeds what is generally considered a phablet screen size.
Generally considered by whom besides yourself now that it suits your argument?
That's not something that just now suits my argument, it's been my argument for months.
Failure to answer the question.
I didn't answer your question because it was based on a flawed premise.
Fine: Generally considered by whom besides yourself?
Now you'll have to find another excuse to run away.TechFeed calls it an '8" phablet'Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
I don't care what Techfeed calls it.
And yet you've never provide a source for who "generally considers" to have too big a screen...Alan Baker<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5xOrPyaxes>Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
So does TechAdvisor:
So what? Did they design the phone? Nooooope. Even if they did, it's still too big to be a phablet.
And yet you've never provide a source for who "generally considers" that to be so...Alan Baker'Samsung Galaxy Note 8 video review - 8in phablet is good, but expensive'Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
<http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/videos/3460128/samsung-galaxy-note-8-video-review--8in-phablet-is-good-but-expensive/>
Don't care what pcadvisor says either. It ain't a real phablet.
Hmmm... ...all these techs sites agree it's a phablet, but a fan boy says it isn't a "real" one.
I mean really, c'mon. Those tech sites have hopped on an industry buzzword regardless if it is inaccurately used. As if that is the first time it has ever happened... ...imagine that.