Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
From | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
Date | 07/01/2014 06:09 (07/01/2014 00:09) |
Message-ID | <lotcan$7kv$1@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Alan Baker |
Followups | Alan Baker (1m) > Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
Alan Baker"And the you"? What kind of Canuck syntax is that?
On 2014-07-01 02:41:05 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
On 6/30/2014 10:39 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Apple Fan NotHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 2014-07-01 02:33:57 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:On 6/30/2014 10:29 PM, Alan Baker wrote:"Any phablets >designed< as such generally do fit in pockets however."On 2014-07-01 02:24:36 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:provide a cite where I >specifically< said ">ALL< phablets fit in pants pockets". I mean, generally phablets do, but i never quite said exactly that. NOTE: the 'generally' is just like you like to twist 'typically', and means there may be exceptions.On 6/30/2014 9:34 PM, -hh wrote:Nope. Wrong again.Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy wrote:circular argument.-hh wrote:It can, but not when in the context of the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy.As soon as 'Harry' used the word 'true' as a qualifier, the jig was up.Why is that? "True" can carry the context of "primarily designed as"It did precisely. In a nutshell:And your usage perfectly followed the fallacy as illustrated.like hell it did...
"All phablets fit in pants pockets... ...except the Galaxy Note 8... ...but that's not a true phablet".
I did say 'generally' meaning there may be exceptions, kinda like the way you like to twist 'typically'.
And the you engaged in the "no true Scotsman" fallacy.
"A few weasel word"? A "Few"(meaning more than one) is contradicted by the singular "Weasle word". You really are syntactically challenged aren't you?Apple Fan Not
A few weasel word, but close enough.
-- my favorite company is *anybody* BUT >Apple<!Alan BakerThe Galaxy Note 8 was designed as a phablet.
No reply?
You were supposed to supply some other criteria besides screen size that it didn't meet, but you punked out on that, too.