Google| Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
| From | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
| Date | 07/01/2014 04:33 (06/30/2014 22:33) |
| Message-ID | <lot6ml$cd0$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Alan Baker |
| Followups | Alan Baker (5m) > Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
On 6/30/2014 10:29 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
Alan Bakerprovide a cite where I >specifically< said ">ALL< phablets fit in pants pockets". I mean, generally phablets do, but i never quite said exactly that. NOTE: the 'generally' is just like you like to twist 'typically', and means there may be exceptions.
On 2014-07-01 02:24:36 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
On 6/30/2014 9:34 PM, -hh wrote:Apple Fan NotHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy wrote:-hh wrote:It can, but not when in the context of the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy.As soon as 'Harry' used the word 'true' as a qualifier, the jig was up.Why is that? "True" can carry the context of "primarily designed as"
circular argument.
Nope. Wrong again.Alan BakerApple Fan NotHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
And your usage perfectly followed the fallacy as illustrated.
like hell it did...
It did precisely. In a nutshell:
"All phablets fit in pants pockets... ...except the Galaxy Note 8... ...but that's not a true phablet".
-- my favorite company is *anybody* BUT >Apple<!Apple Fan NotHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Wiggle wriggle...but you're still hooked; irrevocably so.
no I'm not....Apple Fan Not
-hh
06/25/2014-
