Google| Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
| From | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
| Date | 07/01/2014 04:24 (06/30/2014 22:24) |
| Message-ID | <lot653$9d0$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | -hh |
| Followups | Alan Baker (4m) > Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
On 6/30/2014 9:34 PM, -hh wrote:
-hhcircular argument.
Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy wrote:Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy-hh
-hh wrote:-hhHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
As soon as 'Harry' used the word 'true' as a qualifier, the jig was up.
Why is that? "True" can carry the context of "primarily designed as"
It can, but not when in the context of the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy.
And your usage perfectly followed the fallacy as illustrated.like hell it did...
Wiggle wriggle...but you're still hooked; irrevocably so.no I'm not....
-hh-- my favorite company is *anybody* BUT >Apple<!
06/25/2014-
