Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
-hh wrote:

-hh
Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy wrote:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
-hh wrote:

-hh
Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy wrote:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Review: "No way this will work for long The back on the Galaxy S2 is thin as paper and will come off the phone pretty easily."

-hh
Translation: "No ***TRUE*** belt holster would be low quality..."

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Now who's resorting to a 'No true scotsman' argument....

-hh
The 'No True Scotsman' isn't an argument, but the identification of a logical fallacy. And applying & tailoring the language from Wiki to your claim here, we obtain:

"When faced with a counterexample to a universal claim ("[no belt holster exists for this phablet]"), rather than denying the counterexample or rejecting the original universal claim, this fallacy modifies the subject of the assertion to exclude the specific case or others like it by rhetoric, without reference to any specific objective rule ("[no true belt holster would be of such low quality"]),[2] creating an implied tautology. It can also be used to create unnecessary requirements by adding "true" or "real" to the subject." <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman>, as applied

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
blah....blah...blah... diarhea dump...qawoooooosh!