Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
From | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
Date | 07/01/2014 02:13 (06/30/2014 20:13) |
Message-ID | <losuek$bk$2@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Alan Baker |
Followups | Alan Baker (2m) > Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
Alan Baker*me* and *wikipedia*....
On 2014-07-01 00:08:17 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
On 6/30/2014 8:00 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 2014-06-30 23:59:14 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
On 6/30/2014 7:49 PM, -hh wrote:-hhHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Alan Baker wrote:Alan Baker-hh
Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
... but I do get to >reject< them as phablets....
No, Fanboy. You don't.
As soon as 'Harry' used the word 'true' as a qualifier, the jig was up.
-hh
Why is that? "True" can carry the context of "primarily designed as" and doesn't have to always remain Anal's recently favorite $10 phrase "No true scotsman"
You're sayint the Galaxy Note 8 is NOT primarily designed as a phablet?
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOL
No, it's not, it may be labeled as such, but labels alone don't make it so.... It's screen size is too big....
...according to?