Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 6/30/2014 8:15 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

Alan Baker
On 2014-07-01 00:13:08 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 6/30/2014 8:09 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

Alan Baker
On 2014-07-01 00:08:17 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 6/30/2014 8:00 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

Alan Baker
On 2014-06-30 23:59:14 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 6/30/2014 7:49 PM, -hh wrote:

-hh
Alan Baker wrote:

Alan Baker
Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
... but I do get to >reject< them as phablets....

Alan Baker
No, Fanboy. You don't.

-hh
As soon as 'Harry' used the word 'true' as a qualifier, the jig was up.

-hh

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Why is that? "True" can carry the context of "primarily designed as" and doesn't have to always remain Anal's recently favorite $10 phrase "No true scotsman"

Alan Baker
You're sayint the Galaxy Note 8 is NOT primarily designed as a phablet?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOL

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
No, it's not, it may be labeled as such, but labels alone don't make it so.... It's screen size is too big....

Alan Baker
...according to?

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
*me* and *wikipedia*....

Alan Baker
No.

1. Wikipedia is not a single source.

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
so what?

Alan Baker
2. It says typically, which means there are exceptions.

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
didn't say there weren't exceptions.

But there are other defining parameters which it doesn't meet either.

Alan Baker
3. It explicitly lists one such exception.

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Exactly, an *exception*, not the norm as with TRUE phablets.....