Skip to main content
news

Re: Google Copying Apple......

Alan Baker
SubjectRe: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung
FromAlan Baker
Date07/01/2014 02:15 (06/30/2014 17:15)
Message-ID<losuj3$8p2$2@news.datemas.de>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
FollowupsHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy (6m) > Alan Baker

On 2014-07-01 00:13:08 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 6/30/2014 8:09 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

Alan Baker
On 2014-07-01 00:08:17 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 6/30/2014 8:00 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

Alan Baker
On 2014-06-30 23:59:14 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 6/30/2014 7:49 PM, -hh wrote:

-hh
Alan Baker wrote:

Alan Baker
Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
... but I do get to >reject< them as phablets....

Alan Baker
No, Fanboy. You don't.

-hh
As soon as 'Harry' used the word 'true' as a qualifier, the jig was up.

-hh

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Why is that? "True" can carry the context of "primarily designed as" and doesn't have to always remain Anal's recently favorite $10 phrase "No true scotsman"

Alan Baker
You're sayint the Galaxy Note 8 is NOT primarily designed as a phablet?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOL

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
No, it's not, it may be labeled as such, but labels alone don't make it so.... It's screen size is too big....

Alan Baker
...according to?

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
*me* and *wikipedia*....

No.

1. Wikipedia is not a single source.

2. It says typically, which means there are exceptions.

3. It explicitly lists one such exception.