Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
From | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
Date | 07/01/2014 02:21 (06/30/2014 20:21) |
Message-ID | <losuv4$2cp$3@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Alan Baker |
Followups | Alan Baker (2m) |
Alan Bakerso what?
On 2014-07-01 00:13:08 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
On 6/30/2014 8:09 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 2014-07-01 00:08:17 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
On 6/30/2014 8:00 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 2014-06-30 23:59:14 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
On 6/30/2014 7:49 PM, -hh wrote:-hhHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Alan Baker wrote:Alan Baker-hh
Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
... but I do get to >reject< them as phablets....
No, Fanboy. You don't.
As soon as 'Harry' used the word 'true' as a qualifier, the jig was up.
-hh
Why is that? "True" can carry the context of "primarily designed as" and doesn't have to always remain Anal's recently favorite $10 phrase "No true scotsman"
You're sayint the Galaxy Note 8 is NOT primarily designed as a phablet?
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOL
No, it's not, it may be labeled as such, but labels alone don't make it so.... It's screen size is too big....
...according to?
*me* and *wikipedia*....
No.
1. Wikipedia is not a single source.
2. It says typically, which means there are exceptions.didn't say there weren't exceptions. But there are other defining parameters which it doesn't meet either.
3. It explicitly lists one such exception.Exactly, an *exception*, not the norm as with TRUE phablets.....