Google| Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
| From | Alan Baker |
| Date | 07/01/2014 02:06 (06/30/2014 17:06) |
| Message-ID | <losu2s$84j$1@news.datemas.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
On 2014-07-01 00:01:38 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:
Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyYou surely do...
On 6/30/2014 7:58 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Apple Fan NotHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 2014-06-30 23:56:14 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:On 6/30/2014 7:29 PM, Alan Baker wrote:No, Fanboy: you don't get to define what terms in common usage mean.On 2014-06-30 23:24:32 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Actually, I do. It's *my* money and I can vote against them and reject them as phablets by not spending it on one of your tablet phones....On 6/30/2014 6:57 PM, Alan Baker wrote:No, Fanboy. You don't.On 2014-06-30 22:55:23 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:no, but I do get to >reject< them as phablets....On 6/30/2014 6:01 PM, KDT wrote:Sorry, but you appear to be saying that you get to decide what Samsung calls its products...And how did I exclude the Galaxy note 8? I said it was not aIf only because Samsung mistakenly coopted the term for a >tablet< of theirs....phablet<, not that it wasn't a phone.----- Well *you* can define it however you wish but every majors review site is calling it a phablet.
You not BUYING something is not rejecting them AS phablets.
I get to tell the salesman trying to sell me one as a phablet that it is not a true phablet as far as I'm concerned, and then walk with my wallet.
...but that doesn't mean it isn't a phablet.
Face it, you backed yourself right into a corner. You argued that all phablets can fit in pants pockets and them you realized you'd fucked up and used precisely what the "no true Scotsman" fallacy talks about.
06/25/2014-
