Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
From | Alan Baker |
Date | 07/01/2014 04:37 (06/30/2014 19:37) |
Message-ID | <lot6tc$ng5$1@news.datemas.de> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
Followups | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy (4m) > Alan Baker |
Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyWell what?
On 6/30/2014 8:06 PM, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy wrote:Apple Fan Not
On 6/30/2014 7:58 PM, Alan Baker wrote:On 2014-06-30 23:56:14 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:On 6/30/2014 7:29 PM, Alan Baker wrote:No, Fanboy: you don't get to define what terms in common usage mean.On 2014-06-30 23:24:32 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Actually, I do. It's *my* money and I can vote against them and reject them as phablets by not spending it on one of your tablet phones....On 6/30/2014 6:57 PM, Alan Baker wrote:No, Fanboy. You don't.On 2014-06-30 22:55:23 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:no, but I do get to >reject< them as phablets....On 6/30/2014 6:01 PM, KDT wrote:Sorry, but you appear to be saying that you get to decide what Samsung calls its products...And how did I exclude the Galaxy note 8? I said it was not aIf only because Samsung mistakenly coopted the term for a >tablet< of theirs....phablet<, not that it wasn't a phone.----- Well *you* can define it however you wish but every majors review site is calling it a phablet.And show me ONE time where Apple refers to an ipad mini w/a VOIP app as a 'phablet'. Betchya can't....Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
well?