Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 6/30/2014 8:07 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

Apple Fan Not
On 2014-07-01 00:06:41 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

On 6/30/2014 7:58 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

On 2014-06-30 23:56:14 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

On 6/30/2014 7:29 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

On 2014-06-30 23:24:32 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

On 6/30/2014 6:57 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

On 2014-06-30 22:55:23 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

On 6/30/2014 6:01 PM, KDT wrote:

And how did I exclude the Galaxy note 8? I said it was not a

phablet<, not that it wasn't a phone.

----- Well *you* can define it however you wish but every majors review site is calling it a phablet.

If only because Samsung mistakenly coopted the term for a

tablet<

of theirs....

Sorry, but you appear to be saying that you get to decide what Samsung calls its products...

no, but I do get to >reject< them as phablets....

No, Fanboy. You don't.

Actually, I do. It's *my* money and I can vote against them and reject them as phablets by not spending it on one of your tablet phones....

No, Fanboy: you don't get to define what terms in common usage mean.

And dhow me ONE time where Apple refers to an ipad mini w/a VOIP app as a 'phablet'. Betchya can't....

And now you've switched to another dodge.

You not BUYING something is not rejecting them AS phablets.

Yes it is.....

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Not a dodge. You're evasion in asnswering my challenge is the actual dodge. This whole thing about what constitutes a phablet arose over you and KDT stubbornly constantly conflating phones with phablets.

So therefore, I CHALLENGE you to provide a cite where Apple refers to an iPad mini w/a voip as a 'phablet' (or even specifically as a 'phone').

What? Got no hair on yer balls? Try plucking a few from your asshole, Anal, and gluing them on yer nuts...