Google| Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
| From | Alan Baker |
| Date | 07/01/2014 01:58 (06/30/2014 16:58) |
| Message-ID | <lostis$74a$1@news.datemas.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
| Followups | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy (3m) > Alan Baker Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy (8m) > Alan Baker |
On 2014-06-30 23:56:14 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:
Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyNo, Fanboy: you don't get to define what terms in common usage mean.
On 6/30/2014 7:29 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 2014-06-30 23:24:32 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
On 6/30/2014 6:57 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 2014-06-30 22:55:23 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
On 6/30/2014 6:01 PM, KDT wrote:KDTHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
And how did I exclude the Galaxy note 8? I said it was not aHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyKDT
phablet<, not that it wasn't a phone.
----- Well *you* can define it however you wish but every majors review site is calling it a phablet.
If only because Samsung mistakenly coopted the term for a >tablet< of theirs....
Sorry, but you appear to be saying that you get to decide what Samsung calls its products...
no, but I do get to >reject< them as phablets....
No, Fanboy. You don't.
Actually, I do. It's *my* money and I can vote against them and reject them as phablets by not spending it on one of your tablet phones....
You not BUYING something is not rejecting them AS phablets.
06/25/2014-
