Subject | Re: mac sales down |
From | Steve Carroll |
Date | 05/16/2008 06:24 (05/15/2008 22:24) |
Message-ID | <trollkiller-44D620.22245315052008@newsgroups.comcast.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Keith Ream |
Keith Ream... that you only had two working brain cells and by the time the message was passed from one to the other it was all garbled? True.
Steve Carroll wrote:Steve CarrollKeith Ream
In article <C452109A.B99BA%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:SnitSteve Carroll
"Glorb" <Glorb@orb.com>stated in post e3a35$482cc0ad$3229@news.teranews.com on 5/15/08 4:01 PM:GlorbSnit
Snit wrote:SnitGlorb
"Glorb" <Glorb@orb.com>stated in post 4e891$482caf09$27416@news.teranews.com on 5/15/08 2:45 PM:SnitWhat Keith Ream stated:Glorb
Many people and not just for rational reasons. People like the cool factor of having a tiny computer much as they like the cool factor of certain cars.
Your reply:
IOW, you're saying it's for irrational, egotistical people who don't really do much with a computer?
I didn't forget either of those, and I stand by my answer.SnitGlorb
Being that Keith Ream did *not* say it was for people who were "egotistical" nor for people who "don't really do much with a computer"
Sure he did. He said they buy an inadequate computer just because it looks cool.
No, he did not. You are simply lying.Snityour interpretation of his comments is clearly faulty.Glorb
Your disagreement does not render my interpretation faulty.
Correct: it is not my disagreement which renders your interpretation faulty. You simply lied.SnitWe can go round and round on this for the next 6 months, if you like, but it will not change the fact your comments were absurd.Glorb
You're confusing your lies with facts again.
You lied. I quoted your lie. You can deal with it or not.
Asshat.
Gee, I prove you are a liar and you call me a name that has been associated with Steve Carroll.
A name that is now "associated" with you.
See how reality works YET? LOL!
Once you realized