Subject | Re: mac sales down |
From | Steve Carroll |
Date | 05/12/2008 14:57 (05/12/2008 06:57) |
Message-ID | <trollkiller-28EBC0.06574212052008@newsgroups.comcast.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (3h & 25m) > Steve Carroll Snit (5h & 48m) > Steve Carroll Snit (10h & 21m) Snit (14h & 56m) Snit (1d, 1h & 17m) > Steve Carroll Snit (1d, 3h & 39m) Snit (1d, 16h & 47m) Snit (5d, 4h & 4m) |
SnitShow evidence that I ever used "one" sock puppet any time you'd like to.
"Tim Murray" <no-spam@thankyou.com>stated in post I0PVj.3124$hv2.2824@bignews5.bellsouth.net on 5/11/08 8:43 PM:Tim MurraySnit
On Sun, 11 May 2008 22:53:51 -0400, Snit wrote:SnitTim Murray
Why, Hamster Boy, would you call weedhopper "Zara"?
You've been here long enough. You know it is.
Show me the proof. I am not saying you are wrong - I am merely noting that if there is not proof (or, really, strong support) then the accusation should be dropped.
As an example: there is plenty of reason to suspect that CSMA Moderator is one of Steve Carroll's sock puppets
- stronger evidence, I believe, than that Zara and weedhopper are the same - but I do not bring that up repeatedly.You're lying... you've brought it up repeatedly... in a failed attempt to convince people that I use a sock puppet army... like you do.