Subject | Re: mac sales down |
From | Steve Carroll |
Date | 05/13/2008 15:43 (05/13/2008 07:43) |
Message-ID | <trollkiller-121906.07430613052008@newsgroups.comcast.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
SnitCorrection: *You* opine that his evidence isn't "strong". That his evidence doesn't prove anything for *you* doesn't mean others are not 'convinced' by it. Of course, being a sock puppet using troll yourself, you have a vested interest in not seeing sock puppets exposed... so you will pretend they aren't. Funny how evidence works as proof, isn't it?
"Tim Murray" <no-spam@thankyou.com>stated in post tA8Wj.11112$C8.6910@bignews2.bellsouth.net on 5/12/08 9:15 PM:Tim MurraySnit
On Sun, 11 May 2008 23:56:28 -0400, Snit wrote:Tim MurrayYou've been here long enough. You know it is.Snit
Show me the proof. I am not saying you are wrong - I am merely noting that if there is not proof (or, really, strong support) then the accusation should be dropped.
Writing style, word usage, standard misspellings, phrasing, and headers.
I accept there is room for suspicion. OK. So we have no really strong evidence just reasonable suspicion.