Subject | Re: mac sales down |
From | ZnU |
Date | 05/12/2008 08:38 (05/12/2008 02:38) |
Message-ID | <znu-D5CE01.02385212052008@news.individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Mayor Of R'lyeh |
Followups | Mayor Of R'lyeh (2d, 21h & 15m) > ZnU |
Mayor Of R'lyehDoing a cost comparison based on some hypothetical user's needs is useless in an advocacy group, though, because one can trivially define the user's needs to make the Mac look bad. For instance, insist that the user needs a particular graphics card only available in a high-end tower on the Mac side, but that can be tossed into a free slot on an $800 Windows tower, and then screech about how the Mac costs 5x as much, ignoring the fact that it's a vastly more powerful machine in every other way.
On Sun, 11 May 2008 23:59:36 -0500, Chance Furlong <t-bone@megakatcity.com>wrote:Chance FurlongMayor Of R'lyeh
In article <rfhf24teh4oktrgobjans1hdr73g1unq7g@4ax.com>, Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@gmail.com>wrote:Mayor Of R'lyeh
On Sun, 11 May 2008 22:12:47 -0600, Warchild <bob@bob.com>wrote:Chance FurlongWarchildMayor Of R'lyeh
That old horseshoe has been disproved time and time again.
Only when artificially skewed in the Mac's favor.
How is it artificially skewed in the Mac's favor? I ask for in formation only.
The most glaring example of that is the insistence of using the Mac as the baseline instead of the user's wants and/or needs.
The other way is to try and inflate the costs of PCs by insisting on adding some phantom assembly fee that you're supposed to charge yourself for building your own PC. That's like insisting that you charge yourself what a restaurant would every time you cook your meal.The proper answer to the you-can't-build-your-own argument against the Mac is that the vast majority of computer users have neither the desire nor the knowledge to build their own computers and thus, while this argument might be compelling for certain individual users, it's largely irrelevant to the subject of which platform is better overall, the main focus of advocacy discussions.