Subject | Re: Snit digest 61 / 2015-12-01 |
From | Slimer |
Date | 12/01/2015 18:34 (12/01/2015 12:34) |
Message-ID | <n3klil$fi1$1@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
PGP | gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 1 18:34:31 2015 CET
gpg: using RSA key 8C057E07FFAEBFAE
gpg: BAD signature from "Andrzej Matuch |
Follows | Sandman |
SandmanHe's like one of the Linux losers; you can show him piles of evidence and he'll either tell you that the source is not credible or ignore it altogether. It's not worth even bothering and I get the impression that it's the reason why Peter the Klöwn adamantly refuses to give him any kind of information.
In article <D2830A04.65A6A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[530] You claim I am incorrect... but show no evidence.
Incorrect.