Subject | Re: Snit Socks Coming Out Of The Wood Work |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/01/2015 00:17 (11/30/2015 16:17) |
Message-ID | <D282271B.65980%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (8h & 1m) > Snit |
If that was true actual comments would be noted that were not "fine". Note NONE listed... just meta-claims that they exist. Speaking of them as if they do but not being able to find them.SnitSandman
My behavior is fine...
Ever notice that you're the only one that regard your behaviors as "fine"?
Well, this thread is a great example!SnitSandman
notice the debates almost always go to meta-debate nonsense and do not even focus on my doing any wrong.
No, I have never noticed that, actually.
I did no such thing. I noted, correctly, that Slimer started by saying someone with morals and values would not "submit" to anxiety... which is as ignorant as saying someone with morals and values would not "submit" to MS. He also said:SnitSandman
You did try to actually find me doing wrong recently...
You mean above, when I pointed out once, no twice, that you misrepresented what someone had said? Yes, indeed.
I respond to a bunch of people who are obsessed with me. And I do post a lot... but not about any one person!SandmanSnitSnitSandman
Whatever health issues I have are not relevant. This is a general discussion of anxiety disorders - not about me! Remember, I am not that interesting.
I think you're very interesting, but that's beside the point.
Well, people in COLA and CSMA are obsessed with me.
And you with them, apparently.
If them posting about you is a sign of obsession, then you posting about them must mean the exact same thing.I rarely post about people and do not do as you and Slimer are doing and make up stories about people's lives.
It is sick, really.SnitSandman
It is like they have never seen honor and honesty before... which also explains why when anyone who shows any decent character comes to these groups they are accused of being me.
Haha, good one.
See above.SnitSandman
I respond because it amused me and I find psychology interesting.
But what is the point?
Are you responding only for your own amusement, is this your response? Your responses have no actual goal other than to fulfill your own sense of amusement, do I understand your answer correctly?Well, depends on the post. In this thread, yeah - pretty much (though also to understand how desperate you and others are to pull me down to your level... I would suggest instead you work to improve yourself). But, sure, I am amused by how pathetic you and Slimer are being. In other threads I might post for other reasons, such as to learn or educate. I actually prefer those types of threads but in COLA they are rare.
So your big observation is I am in threads where I post. Um, wow!SandmanAs you are aware, you are always in threads where people disagree with you.Snit
I do not follow all threads to see where people agree or disagree with me
I was in reference to the threads you're "in", meaning that by definition you are following them.
Above you said "always"... why the change to "most (if not all)"?SnitSandman
so, no I do not know your claim to be true... nor is there any reason to think it is true.
On what basis do you claim that it isn't true that in most (if not all)
threads you participate you are doing so with a person that disagrees with what you are saying?No evidence of this being true. Might be in COLA and CSMA... but these are forums filled with trolls who see me and often show, as you do, signs of deep insecurity. And that intrigues me.
I find amusement in how you publicly display your insecurity and lack of confidence; where you seek to put others down to try to feel better about yourself; where you make accusations you cannot back against those you see as your betters.SandmanWhat is it with those threads that keep you posting to them - what is the goal with your participation in them?Snit
See above.
Where you said that your motive for participating in threads is for your own amusement, correct? Where by extension you find amusement in animosity towards you, right? And where you find amusement in being disagreed with, being called names and being generally disliked? Just trying to interpret your answer correctly here.
You implied common use of socks. This is a direct lie from you.SandmanSnitSandmanWhen was the last time anyone (other than a sock puppet of yours) said "Thanks" to something you said? And even if you can find such a post, how much of the actual responses are those percentage-wise?Snit
And then you repeat the "everyone is Snit" gag. Yawn.
No answer for the question, then? Curious.
Your question has a dishonest implication in it... as such there is no way to answer.
In what way did it have a supposed "dishonest" implication? It's a sincere question.
Yes. You are working to keep a calm demeanor, but you are making false accusations, etc. You are not making a good showing!SnitSandman
See: this is also part of the "fun" for me... to note how people such as you troll and watch you freak out. :)
Ah, am I "freaking out" now? I see. Interesting.
Oh, I can make a point fine and you can either miss it or, as you did with your CSS, publicly claim the point is not true. But you clearly DID get the point because you altered your CSS.SandmanSnitSandmanI'm sure you feel that you're often trying to make a point, but the real question is, *are* you making the point? I.e. even if you feel you have a good and solid view on a given subject, do you ever find that you "win" the argument and the opposing person adopts your viewpoint?Food for thought.Snit
If you think I have failed to back a point then show it...
That's not the question though.
Of course I am making points.
There is a difference between *having* a point, and *making* a point, as I'm sure you're aware. Making a point is achieved only and if you manage to convey it to the other party successfully and it is accepted.
I am fully aware of the fact that you think yo *have* a point in any given discussion, I am asking you when or if you ever have managed to *make* that point. Meaning, when was the last time you had a "discussion" or whatever you want to call it on USENET where you successfully made your point and the one you were talking to accepted it as valid?I will leave it to you to obsess and care about such things about me. I mean, really... WTF?
And if you can find such an occurrence, how large is it percentage-wise when compared to the times you failed to make a point?Given the level of dishonesty in COLA and CSMA there is no way to judge for these groups. As noted, you proved you got my point about your CSS *as* you lied and claimed to not only fail to get my point but lied and claimed the point was false.