Google| Subject | Re: Snit digest 151 / 2015-12-17 |
| From | Ezekiel |
| Date | 12/17/2015 18:18 (12/17/2015 12:18) |
| Message-ID | <n4uqjl$bnr$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Snit (14m) Barry H (Snit) (49m) |
"Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote in message news:sandman-9382a2c2d7c8f31d39199c1a072a9c72@individual.net...
SandmanSnit is a "joke" - a sad joke that is.
In article <D29834A9.67370%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[1102] Sandman altered what I said by adding numbers to track his own [1102] trolling (39), and the fact I did so as a JOKE in 2004 or so and in [1102] another forum does not change the fact I do not use such services [1102] (as a general statement).
Joke or not, it has been shown that you have used TOR to post to usenet using sock puppets. So your claim:
Snit 12/17/2015 12:43:38 AM <D297453A.672BC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>Game. Set. Match.
"I use a Usenet provider that does not post my IP, but I do not use any such anonymizer service for Usenet."
Is a direct lie, fully "quotable".
After being caught directly in a quotable lie Shit can't come back and excuse that lie because his nym was a "joke."
Years ago an "advocate" named High Plains Thumper was caught lying about nymshifting. At first he pretended that he was doing a "social experiment" or some nonsense like that. Unlike Snit, he was honest and honorable enough to at least admit he used fake nyms.
Meanwhile the piece of Snit lies to much that he can't even remember his nyms or his previous claims about not using them or his documented posts through anonymizers.
12/10/2015-
-
-
-
