Google| Subject | Re: Snit digest 149 / 2015-12-17 |
| From | Steve Carroll |
| Date | 12/17/2015 19:47 (12/17/2015 10:47) |
| Message-ID | <21f2936c-6c94-4a53-bc54-7c326dcbd50e@googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 9:45:23 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
SnitWe got it, sigmond... in your twisted version of a 'mind', where forging posting IDs is no "big deal" (or even a "little deal"), a trivial thing like using sock puppets is a "JOKE".
On 12/17/15, 9:15 AM, in article n4umu8$rce$1@dont-email.me, "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com>wrote:EzekielSnit
"Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote in message news:sandman-7b1ae0741e42f7b8d5a2b7a05c7b120b@individual.net...SandmanEzekiel
In article <D297453A.672BC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[1082] Neither meaning would apply to me. I use a Usenet provider that does [1082] not post my IP, but I do not use any such anonymizer service for [1082] Usenet.
Quotable lie #12
Indeed this is another quoatable lie.
Sandman altered what I said by adding numbers to track his own trolling, and the fact I did so as a JOKE
(cue up another dishonest red herring by Snit to shine the light away from his BS)
12/10/2015-
-
-
-
