Subject | Re: Snit post-editing |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/15/2015 20:07 (12/15/2015 12:07) |
Message-ID | <D295B30D.67120%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | vallor |
Followups | Sandman (13m) > Snit |
vallorSo many unquotable lies! Horrible! Keep in mind I posted links to the proof Carroll lies about being hacked and forged.
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 09:27:48 +0000, Sandman wrote:Sandmanvallor
In article <D290E558.66C88%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:Snit
...SnitSandman
2013-12-12 | Steve Carroll | fretwizzen@gmail.com |
...SandmanSnitThere may be, but I would say it is from multiple people using TOR, not because this is all tied to Carroll in any way. Not saying they could not be him, but I do not think your above evidence is enough to say it has been shown it is him.Sandman
Nothing above is from Steve Carroll, Snit.
I left above the relevant quote where you specifically note it is.
Incorrect. As you know, that is not Steve Carrolls' email address. You are now being willfully deceitful.
Clearly another S*it lie.
Watch as he sticks his head in the digital sand, claiming his lies "aren't quotable", when they are quoted constantly.Yet you fail to quote one. Why is that?