Subject | Re: Snit digest 139 / 2015-12-15 |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/15/2015 21:11 (12/15/2015 13:11) |
Message-ID | <D295C21F.67152%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Barry H (Snit) |
Barry H (Snit)Nowhere.... but Sandman broke his word by changing the subject line to push his trolling and by linking to his dishonest trolling site... and he left out context.
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:34:59 -0000 (UTC), linuxiac wrote:linuxiacBarry H (Snit)
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:21:20 +0000, Sandman wrote:Sandmanlinuxiac
In article <D295B30D.67120%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[1037] So many unquotable lies (80)! Horrible! Keep in mind I posted links [1037] to the proof Carroll lies (81) about being hacked and forged.
Incorrect, you did no such thing. You posted claims, not proof. There is quite a difference.SnitSandman
[1038] Yet you fail to quote one. Why is that?
Here's a recent one:
Snit Re: Snit post-editing 12/10/2015 <D28F42B0.66A13%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
"Returning context you either accidently or purposely remove is not a lie, no matter how much you guys try to twist it."
Where you lied about returning context when what you in fact was doing was forging the context.SnitSandman
[1039] Meanwhile SANDMAN is the one who noted material is from "Steve [1039] Carroll" then denied it when he realized he just worked against his [1039] co-troll (26).
[X] Ignoring evidence (http://tinyurl.com/nz5x39v) [X] Unsubstantiated accusations (http://tinyurl.com/pojrtxt) [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/ncvfhl2)
Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------Sandmanlinuxiac
troll 26 | lying/lie 81 | incest 2 sex 0 | honorable 2 | honest 5 run 5 | css 6 | tilde 0
Here's another one:
"Comes down to I am seen as better and more honest than most in COLA "
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/6Sfn53Y- bT4/hGUCgnOCBwAJ
Snit is racking up one lie after another. He must be headed for another breakdown.
Where did snit lie?