Subject | Re: Snit post-editing |
From | Sandman |
Date | 12/12/2015 20:58 (12/12/2015 20:58) |
Message-ID | <sandman-98285a7941003a15b060d81759bbb7af@individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (15m) > Sandman |
Sandman
2013-12-12 | Steve Carroll | fretwizzen@gmail.com
Since it is the wrong email address, it is not Steve Carroll, as you well know.SnitSandmanSnitSnitSandman
There may be, but I would say it is from multiple people using TOR, not because this is all tied to Carroll in any way. Not saying they could not be him, but I do not think your above evidence is enough to say it has been shown it is him.
Nothing above is from Steve Carroll, Snit.
I left above the relevant quote where you specifically note it is.
Incorrect. As you know, that is not Steve Carrolls' email address. You are now being willfully deceitful.
You specifically noted it was Steve Carroll.
And the fact Carroll uses multiple email addresses does not change the fact it is him.[X] Unsubstantiated accusation.
What is 100% predictable is you will lie to back Carroll.There is no lie, and no "backing" necessary. Steve Carroll has only ever posted with Comcast dynamic IP's from the Colorado area. Any scenario where one would want to make it seem like he change one letter of his email and also post with TOR proxies when using that slight change is doomed to fail based on pure logic.
You pretend to wish to seek truthWhen did I ever claim to "seek" the truth? Where am I supposedly searching for this somehow elusive truth? I only ever *speak* the truth, and I substantiate my claims thoroughly.
but you will lie.Never.
Why? Because you are breaking #1:
1) Not bring up long dead debates, INCLUDING trolling someone over being butthurt over them when you have been proved to be wrong.What supposed "long dead debate" did I "bring up", Michael?
You troll me over being butthurt over long dead debates.Outright lie #8