Subject | Re: Snit post-editing |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/12/2015 16:55 (12/12/2015 08:55) |
Message-ID | <D2919174.66D3D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (4h & 2m) > Snit |
SandmanYou specifically noted it was Steve Carroll. And the fact Carroll uses multiple email addresses does not change the fact it is him. Even Carroll has referred to which of his email addresses he means when he speaks of them (accusing me of hacking them).
In article <D290E558.66C88%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:Snit
...SnitSandman
2013-12-12 | Steve Carroll | fretwizzen@gmail.com |
...SandmanSnitThere may be, but I would say it is from multiple people using TOR, not because this is all tied to Carroll in any way. Not saying they could not be him, but I do not think your above evidence is enough to say it has been shown it is him.Sandman
Nothing above is from Steve Carroll, Snit.
I left above the relevant quote where you specifically note it is.
Incorrect. As you know, that is not Steve Carrolls' email address. You are now being willfully deceitful.