Snit
On 12/13/15, 10:08 AM, in article sandman-8586d9d0d2c851cf3d9c095d5ddde0c3@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <D292EEB3.66E8B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
[918] Just some of your unsupported claims:

Sandman
[X] Ignoring evidence (http://tinyurl.com/nz5x39v)

<http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/steve>

There you can see the two email addresses, how they have been used. As can clearly be seen, Steve Carroll only ever posts from a comcast IP, and the forgeries using the incorrect email address only ever posts from known TOR proxies.

Now it's your turn - to counter this proof and show that your claim is correct, by using substantiation - not interpretation of quotes from posts, by using solid evidence.

Either that, or retract it. Those are your choices. I am waiting.

Snit
Another chance for you:

Just some of your unsupported claims:

----- As you know, that is not Steve Carrolls' email address. ------ <http://tinyurl.com/nz5x39v>shows NO support that Carroll is not using the two email addresses, nor that even if he was not I would have any reason or way to "know" this (and you ignore how Carroll has been shown to repeatedly lie about being hacked and forged).

------ Since it is the wrong email address, it is not Steve Carroll, as you well know. ------ <http://tinyurl.com/nz5x39v>shows NO evidence it is not Steve Carroll, nor any sign I would know this even if it was the case (and you ignore the proof it is Carroll).

----- Steve Carroll only ever posts from a comcast IP ----- <http://tinyurl.com/nz5x39v>shows NO support that Carroll only posts from that IP.

----- the forgeries using the incorrect email address only ever posts from known TOR proxies. ----- <http://tinyurl.com/nz5x39v>shows NO support that the posts through TOR proxies are "forgeries".

Back it or retract it. Or do what you always do - troll and lie.