Google| Subject | Re: Snit digest 139 / 2015-12-15 |
| From | linuxiac |
| Date | 12/15/2015 20:34 (12/15/2015 19:34) |
| Message-ID | <n4pq13$c6v$2@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Slimer (10m) Barry H (Snit) (17m) Marly Parlor (23m) Snit (35m) |
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:21:20 +0000, Sandman wrote:
Sandman-------------------------------------------------------------------------
In article <D295B30D.67120%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[1037] So many unquotable lies (80)! Horrible! Keep in mind I posted links [1037] to the proof Carroll lies (81) about being hacked and forged.
Incorrect, you did no such thing. You posted claims, not proof. There is quite a difference.SnitSandman
[1038] Yet you fail to quote one. Why is that?
Here's a recent one:
Snit Re: Snit post-editing 12/10/2015 <D28F42B0.66A13%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
"Returning context you either accidently or purposely remove is not a lie, no matter how much you guys try to twist it."
Where you lied about returning context when what you in fact was doing was forging the context.SnitSandman
[1039] Meanwhile SANDMAN is the one who noted material is from "Steve [1039] Carroll" then denied it when he realized he just worked against his [1039] co-troll (26).
[X] Ignoring evidence (http://tinyurl.com/nz5x39v) [X] Unsubstantiated accusations (http://tinyurl.com/pojrtxt) [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/ncvfhl2)
Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09):
troll 26 | lying/lie 81 | incest 2 sex 0 | honorable 2 | honest 5 run 5 | css 6 | tilde 0Here's another one:
"Comes down to I am seen as better and more honest than most in COLA "
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/6Sfn53Y- bT4/hGUCgnOCBwAJ
Snit is racking up one lie after another. He must be headed for another breakdown.
12/10/2015-
-
-
-
