Google| Subject | Snit digest 124 / 2015-12-12 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 12/12/2015 21:06 (12/12/2015 21:06) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-8be907e2506cbe8046d6bf92d4630956@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (9m) |
In article <D291927F.66D42%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
Snit[X] Ignoring evidence (http://tinyurl.com/nz5x39v) [X] Diversion (http://tinyurl.com/o63ee7l)
[823] Again, empty accusations from you where you ignore what has been [823] said in the past... your trolling (8) is growing as you beg me to [823] join your circus.
And you're back into full-on troll mode, you didn't even last two days before you started to troll again.
What you ran from:
Here is further proof: <http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snitforge.php> You can click on the posts to expand them to see how #6 was forged where you:
1. Inserted the content from #5 as quoted text 2. Inserted my text from #3 3. Ignored the quoted text from #3
100% proof that you lied when you claimed you hadn't done it, and lied by quote-forging a post. There is nothing you can do but ignore this because you *can* *not* counter it in any way. There is no way you can take this substantiation and refute any single part of it.
1: Tim <081220150852313464%teadams$2$0$0$3@earthlink.net> 2: Snit <D28C37D5.6658B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> 3: Sandman <sandman-1b731858d268284815c3e50a9ccedd02@individual.net>
4: Tim <081220150855133133%teadams$2$0$0$3@earthlink.net> 5: Snit <D28C37B8.6658A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
6: Snit <D28C46DE.665C7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In post *6* which was a new thread, you quoted my content from post *3* and added content from post *5* and *4* to my post and thus forged the context of my post.
Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 8 | lying/lie 13 | incest 0 sex 0 | honorable 0 | honest 2 run 3 | css 4 | tilde 0
-- Sandman
12/10/2015-
-
-
-
