Subject | Re: Snit post-editing |
From | Sandman |
Date | 12/11/2015 07:46 (12/11/2015 07:46) |
Message-ID | <sandman-f1382e2e6ef70ce6fb4c0de389bf584b@individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (8h & 40m) > Sandman |
This is an outright lie number #2 since your "request".owl
I had not quoted anyone in that post, yet the lying Assburger Snitfeen Pathtik added all that crap above my post as if I had responded to a post of his.This is another one of those famous "unquotable lies" of his.Sandman
Yeah, he did the same here: <D28C46DE.665C7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>Where he posted a new thread with my content from: <sandman-1b731858d268284815c3e50a9ccedd02@individual.net>Which was a response to this post: <D28C37D5.6658B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>But he replaced the quoted material with the content of this post instead: <D28C37B8.6658A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>Snit
Returning context you either accidently or purposely remove is not a lie, no matter how much you guys try to twist it.
Interesting how you feel the need to make things up about me to push accusations... it shows how you know I am a very honest person.Outright lie #3 since your request, the above is not "made up" and can be easily checked by you or anyone. It is 100% the truth and most news readers will let you click the Message-ID's to view the posts.