Subject | Re: Snit post-editing |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/12/2015 21:14 (12/12/2015 13:14) |
Message-ID | <D291CE18.66D8B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (1h & 52m) > Snit |
SandmanA = A. Steve Carroll is Steve Carroll.
In article <D2919174.66D3D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:2013-12-12 | Steve Carroll | fretwizzen@gmail.comSandmanSnitSandmanSnitSnitSandman
There may be, but I would say it is from multiple people using TOR, not because this is all tied to Carroll in any way. Not saying they could not be him, but I do not think your above evidence is enough to say it has been shown it is him.
Nothing above is from Steve Carroll, Snit.
I left above the relevant quote where you specifically note it is.
Incorrect. As you know, that is not Steve Carrolls' email address. You are now being willfully deceitful.
You specifically noted it was Steve Carroll.
Since it is the wrong email address, it is not Steve Carroll, as you well know.
Carroll sometimes claims one or both of his accounts are "forged" or "hacked", but even he has noted at times that it is one account or the other of his which he is claiming this about. Their is not "accusation" - while Carroll at times has denied he uses both accounts he has also made it clear he does.SnitSandman
And the fact Carroll uses multiple email addresses does not change the fact it is him.
[X] Unsubstantiated accusation.
And you prove me correct, below. You will just continue to lie to back Carroll. No amount of "debating" will stop you from lying.Snit
What is 100% predictable is you will lie to back Carroll.
SandmanYou are trolling me BECAUSE of long dead debates you are butthurt over. It is that simple. You can deny it. You can pretend otherwise. But you will never give any alternative reason why you are lying and trolling me. This is 100% predictable. As such your denials are of NO value.
There is no lie, and no "backing" necessary. Steve Carroll has only ever posted with Comcast dynamic IP's from the Colorado area. Any scenario where one would want to make it seem like he change one letter of his email and also post with TOR proxies when using that slight change is doomed to fail based on pure logic.SnitSandman
You pretend to wish to seek truth
When did I ever claim to "seek" the truth? Where am I supposedly searching for this somehow elusive truth? I only ever *speak* the truth, and I substantiate my claims thoroughly.SnitSandman
but you will lie.
Never.Snit
Why? Because you are breaking #1:1) Not bring up long dead debates, INCLUDING trolling someone over being butthurt over them when you have been proved to be wrong.Sandman
What supposed "long dead debate" did I "bring up", Michael?
If you can offer a better explanation for your lies and trolling, of which denial is NOT one, then I you might be able to push a case here. Otherwise you are just pushing a circus... and looking for even more attention.SnitSandman
You troll me over being butthurt over long dead debates.
Outright lie #8