Subject | Re: Snit post-editing |
From | Slimer |
Date | 12/11/2015 00:36 (12/10/2015 18:36) |
Message-ID | <n4d24v$1g7$3@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
PGP | Andrzej Matuch |
Follows | owl |
Followups | Snit (23m) |
owlac
Slimer <.m@nsn.s>wrote:Slimer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 2015-12-10 5:30 PM, Sheldon Corky wrote:Sheldon Corky
Snit wrote:Snit
On 12/10/15, 3:05 PM, in article dthgjd03.a3r@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:owl
Barry H <barryum@linuxmail.org>wrote:Barry H (Snit)
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:24:32 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:owl
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>wrote:Steve Carroll
On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 1:23:54 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:owl
The lying scumbag Snit responds to one of my posts and adds words to my post. Stop humping my leg you pathetic Assburger!
Message-ID: <D28F2200.669CB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advoc
y/OseGBQy6
OsSlimer
UHc/0P5QrUP8BQAJowlBarry H (Snit)owlowlSteve Carroll
I had not quoted anyone in that post, yet the lying Assburger Snitfeen Pathtik added all that crap above my post as if I had responded to a post of his.
This is another one of those famous "unquotable lies" of his.
WTF is he on now?! Meth?
Now the lying tweeker is lying yet again, saying that my newsreader somehow "snipped context" from my own original post -- which was not a reply to any other post from which context could even have been snipped!
How so?
My post was not a reply to any post. Fucktard added quoted material from another thread to my post as if I had quoted it in a reply.
This was my original post: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/
eGBQy6UHc/
OsSlimer
Tc3uspv7BQAJowl
This was Snit's reply to that: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/
eGBQy6UHc/
Not one soul is fooled anymore yet he continues...owlSlimer
0P5QrUP8BQAJSlimerSnitSheldon Corky
What do you think I was begging Sandman for? Can you quote it?
Of course he can't quote it. Fabricating data and quote mangling is a specialty of Sandman. Factual data seems to get obfuscated in all of the rush to judgement.
Another Snit sock... *plonk*
He has no shame.