Subject | Re: Snit post-editing |
From | Marly Parlor |
Date | 12/15/2015 20:59 (12/15/2015 19:59) |
Message-ID | <n4prec$ion$3@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | linuxiac |
Followups | Snit (21m) |
linuxiacwrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 11:08:06 -0800, tmelmosfire wrote:tmelmosfire (Snit)
On Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:56:36 UTC, vallor wrote:vallor
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 09:27:48 +0000, Sandman wrote:Sandman
In article <D290E558.66C88%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit
isSnit
...SnitSandman
2013-12-12 | Steve Carroll | fretwizzen@gmail.com |
...There may be, but I would say it is from multiple people using TOR, not because this is all tied to Carroll in any way. Not saying they could not be him, but I do not think your above evidence
Has someone proven that they are the same person? Or is this another one of your lies?linuxiactmelmosfire (Snit)vallorSandmanSnitenough to say it has been shown it is him.Sandman
Nothing above is from Steve Carroll, Snit.
I left above the relevant quote where you specifically note it is.
Incorrect. As you know, that is not Steve Carrolls' email address. You are now being willfully deceitful.
Clearly another S*it lie.
Watch as he sticks his head in the digital sand, claiming his lies "aren't quotable", when they are quoted constantly.
-- -v Kernel:4.3.0-sd Desktop:Xfce 4.12.2 Distro:Linux Mint 17.3 Rosa
So quote the lie.
You posting as tmelmosfire and pretending to be someone different than snit Michael Glasser is one whopper, snit.