Subject | Re: Snit post-editing |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/15/2015 21:20 (12/15/2015 13:20) |
Message-ID | <D295C421.6715F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Marly Parlor |
Marly ParlorEveryone is Snit. Hahahahahahahahahahahaha
linuxiac <linuxiac@usa.com>wrote in news:n4pq4r$c6v$4@dont-email.me:linuxiacMarly Parlor
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 11:08:06 -0800, tmelmosfire wrote:tmelmosfire (Snit)
On Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:56:36 UTC, vallor wrote:vallor
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 09:27:48 +0000, Sandman wrote:Sandman
In article <D290E558.66C88%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit
wrote:Marly ParlorSnit
...SnitSandman
2013-12-12 | Steve Carroll | fretwizzen@gmail.com |
...There may be, but I would say it is from multiple people using TOR, not because this is all tied to Carroll in any way. Not saying they could not be him, but I do not think your above evidence
isMarly Parlorlinuxiactmelmosfire (Snit)vallorSandmanSnitSnitSandman
enough to say it has been shown it is him.
Nothing above is from Steve Carroll, Snit.
I left above the relevant quote where you specifically note it is.
Incorrect. As you know, that is not Steve Carrolls' email address. You are now being willfully deceitful.
Clearly another S*it lie.
Watch as he sticks his head in the digital sand, claiming his lies "aren't quotable", when they are quoted constantly.
-- -v Kernel:4.3.0-sd Desktop:Xfce 4.12.2 Distro:Linux Mint 17.3 Rosa
So quote the lie.
You posting as tmelmosfire and pretending to be someone different than snit Michael Glasser is one whopper, snit.
Has someone proven that they are the same person? Or is this another one of your lies?