Google| Subject | Snit digest 139 / 2015-12-15 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 12/15/2015 20:21 (12/15/2015 20:21) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-a34197f45c657b6231e1221162935b4e@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | linuxiac (13m) Snit (48m) > Sandman |
In article <D295B30D.67120%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
SnitIncorrect, you did no such thing. You posted claims, not proof. There is quite a difference.
[1037] So many unquotable lies (80)! Horrible! Keep in mind I posted links [1037] to the proof Carroll lies (81) about being hacked and forged.
[1038] Yet you fail to quote one. Why is that?Here's a recent one:
Snit Re: Snit post-editing 12/10/2015 <D28F42B0.66A13%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
"Returning context you either accidently or purposely remove is not a lie, no matter how much you guys try to twist it."
Where you lied about returning context when what you in fact was doing was forging the context.
[1039] Meanwhile SANDMAN is the one who noted material is from "Steve [1039] Carroll" then denied it when he realized he just worked against his [1039] co-troll (26).[X] Ignoring evidence (http://tinyurl.com/nz5x39v) [X] Unsubstantiated accusations (http://tinyurl.com/pojrtxt) [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/ncvfhl2)
Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 26 | lying/lie 81 | incest 2 sex 0 | honorable 2 | honest 5 run 5 | css 6 | tilde 0
-- Sandman
12/10/2015-
-
-
-
