Subject | Re: Snit post-editing |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/15/2015 21:20 (12/15/2015 13:20) |
Message-ID | <D295C40F.6715E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Marly Parlor |
Followups | linuxiac (3m) > Snit |
Marly ParlorThe response is either to give no quote, or give a quote and not show how it is a lie. Or sometimes point to an error I made, as Ezekiel did earlier today, and insist even though I openly admitted the error and it has been beaten to death, and Ezekiel was the one caught lying, to blame me.
linuxiac <linuxiac@usa.com>wrote in news:n4pprn$c6v$1@dont-email.me:linuxiacMarly Parlor
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 18:56:33 +0000, vallor wrote:vallor
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 09:27:48 +0000, Sandman wrote:Sandman
In article <D290E558.66C88%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:Snit
...SnitSandman
2013-12-12 | Steve Carroll | fretwizzen@gmail.com |
...SandmanSnitThere may be, but I would say it is from multiple people using TOR, not because this is all tied to Carroll in any way. Not saying they could not be him, but I do not think your above evidence is enough to say it has been shown it is him.Sandman
Nothing above is from Steve Carroll, Snit.
I left above the relevant quote where you specifically note it is.
Incorrect. As you know, that is not Steve Carrolls' email address.
YouMarly ParlorlinuxiacSandmanvallor
are now being willfully deceitful.
Clearly another S*it lie.
Watch as he sticks his head in the digital sand, claiming his lies "aren't quotable", when they are quoted constantly.
Snit has been following that exact pattern for years. He is the most dishonest poster in cola. By far.
So point to a direct lie from snit. The truth is you can't and neither can anyone else.