Google| Subject | Re: Snit post-editing |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 12/12/2015 10:33 (12/12/2015 10:33) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-ea74ea830679ad4e32c762cb6c8b61e2@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (6h & 25m) > Sandman |
In article <D290E58A.66C8B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
Such as?SnitSandmanSandmanSnit
And then we see a bit of a difference. He's not writing fewer posts, but writing much less in them, which is good! And yeah, I take some credit for it where he spent some two-three days posting content-free posts.
You take credit for other's actions and blame your own actions on others. Weird.
Outright lie #6 since your request.
You are making false accusations.
This is boring.So why did you respond? I wasn't talking to you, yet you felt you had to respond to something you know claim is "boring".
It comes down to your actions are YOUR responsibility.Where above did I talk about my actions?
My actions are MY responsibility. Above you work to take credit for MY actions.I believe that your misunderstanding on how your trolling were being measured (i.e. you thought that I counted replies, but that's how Michael Patelmo measures HIS trolling), which led you to create a multitude of new threads just to avoid making a reply, this also led you to move your comments on a given post to the subject line that you knew was being ignored, thereby cutting your own trolling short. Of course, it was just as "countable" as before, but as I showed, it successfully minimized your trolling.
-- Sandman
12/10/2015-
-
-
-
