Google| Subject | Snit digest 129 / 2015-12-13 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 12/13/2015 00:54 (12/13/2015 00:54) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-0a668c2742ecdb0a400e05e061382f4b@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (4h & 47m) > Sandman |
In article <D291F693.66DC8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
SnitWhether or not something is a "fact" is determined by substantiation. When you make a claim you have two choices; prove it or take it back. Even if you think it's correct, but can't prove it, then you should retract it, because if you can't substantiate your claim, the claim is not strong enough and should be worded as an opinion, thought or suspicion.
[912] Sandman is told a fact and he just insists it is a lie (40)
As such, your claim is still 0% shown to be true, and as such is at most an opinion of yours that can be disregarded. If you want to elevate it from personal opinion to "fact", substantiation needs to be provided.
Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 18 | lying/lie 41 | incest 1 sex 0 | honorable 1 | honest 4 run 3 | css 5 | tilde 0
-- Sandman
12/10/2015-
-
-
-
