Skip to main content
news

Snit digest 130 / 2015-12-13

Sandman
SubjectSnit digest 130 / 2015-12-13
FromSandman
Date12/13/2015 18:08 (12/13/2015 18:08)
Message-ID<sandman-8586d9d0d2c851cf3d9c095d5ddde0c3@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSnit
FollowupsSnit (36m) > Sandman

In article <D292EEB3.66E8B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
[918] Just some of your unsupported claims:

[X] Ignoring evidence (http://tinyurl.com/nz5x39v)

<http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/steve>

There you can see the two email addresses, how they have been used. As can clearly be seen, Steve Carroll only ever posts from a comcast IP, and the forgeries using the incorrect email address only ever posts from known TOR proxies.

Now it's your turn - to counter this proof and show that your claim is correct, by using substantiation - not interpretation of quotes from posts, by using solid evidence.

Either that, or retract it. Those are your choices. I am waiting.

-- Sandman

Snit (36m) > Sandman