Subject | Re: Snit post-editing |
From | Sandman |
Date | 12/12/2015 23:06 (12/12/2015 23:06) |
Message-ID | <sandman-dd854e10f85f34f26ebaa37a91a90c3d@individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (13m) > Sandman tmelmosfire (Snit) (44m) |
A != B, fretwizzen@gmail is not fretwizzer@gmail.comSandmanSnit
Since it is the wrong email address, it is not Steve Carroll, as you well know.
A = A. Steve Carroll is Steve Carroll.
[X] Unsubstantiated accusation.SnitAnd the fact Carroll uses multiple email addresses does not change the fact it is him.Sandman
[X] Unsubstantiated accusation.
Carroll sometimes claims one or both of his accounts are "forged" or "hacked"
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM: Someone hacked my fretwizzer gmail acct so, for the time being, don't trust anything from it.[X] Unsubstantiated accusation.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM: Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'fretwizzer' gmail account so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume anything that's coming from it was written by me.[X] Unsubstantiated accusation.
And you prove me correct, below. You will just continue to lie to back Carroll. No amount of "debating" will stop you from lying.What is 100% predictable is you will lie to back Carroll.
But let us be very, very clear: it is trivial to point to your direct lies.
----- Steve Carroll has only ever posted with Comcast dynamic IP's from the Colorado area. -----
Not only is this clearly a lie, even if it was not you would have no way of knowing. You ARE lying to back Carroll.[X] Unsubstantiated accusation.
What supposed "long dead debate" did I bring up?Sandman
There is no lie, and no "backing" necessary. Steve Carroll has only ever posted with Comcast dynamic IP's from the Colorado area. Any scenario where one would want to make it seem like he change one letter of his email and also post with TOR proxies when using that slight change is doomed to fail based on pure logic.SnitSandman
You pretend to wish to seek truth
When did I ever claim to "seek" the truth? Where am I supposedly searching for this somehow elusive truth? I only ever *speak* the truth, and I substantiate my claims thoroughly.SnitSandman
but you will lie.
Never.SnitSnit
Why? Because you are breaking #1:1) Not bring up long dead debates, INCLUDING trolling someone over being butthurt over them when you have been proved to be wrong.Sandman
What supposed "long dead debate" did I "bring up", Michael?
You are trolling me BECAUSE of long dead debates you are butthurt over.