Google| Subject | Re: nospam still hiding in the tall grass (was: The closest we'll get to nospam admitting to an erro |
| From | Whisky-dave |
| Date | 01/27/2016 14:53 (01/27/2016 05:53) |
| Message-ID | <45ce5641-71d7-4f1d-8a89-c6a53ed6fb00@googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | nospam |
| Followups | nospam (2d, 11h & 42m) > Whisky-dave |
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 12:37:48 UTC, nospam wrote:
nospamYou haven't got a clue have you, you got it wrong now move along likew you always do.
In article <d862b323-9422-44a9-b12c-370bef4c7295@googlegroups.com>, Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>wrote:nospamthey don't provide actual facts, they just say "you're wrong", expecting that is all it takes. laughable.Whisky-dave
Like you did when I potest proof that snipping on ebay isnt; effective and doesn;t really work but they want you to think it does so you spend more\than you might have if you stopped to think.
you didn't 'potest proof' of anything. all you did was spew rubbish.
Only a moron woud use the word dead to decribe such a thing.nospamkodak filed for bankruptcy. saying film is dead is not wrong.Whisky-dave
Doesn't make it dead, just less used than it was. The word dead has particualar uses perhaps you need to find a more apt word for film than dead.
it's an expression. only an idiot would take it literally.
Analogue IS bettere than digital only someone that doesn;t understand digital would say something like that. You doi know that digital decribes an analogue signal chopped up into descrete pieces. You'd have to be really stupid to not understand that....nospami've said vinyl records cannot beat digital audio and film cannot beat digital photography and people start arguing that some people like vinyl records and some movie producers still use film.Whisky-dave
So hardly dead then as you said. Analogue is better than digital for almost everything.
nonsense.
this is why ACC is 'better' than MP3 and why loss-less is better than both. But there;s lots of peole liek you that think the MP3s they have are better than the original recording because they have beat headphones ot turn the bass up.
So it;'s better than a DSLR is it ?Whisky-davenospam
Just like smartphones are better cameras than 'cameras' .
not every situation requires an slr. a smartphone fits into your pocket and is always with you.
Microphones are analogue devices.Whisky-davenospam
Easily possible all music is recorded using anlogue and then it's chopped upto digital and some bits thrown away
complete utter nonsense. you haven't a fucking clue. nothing is thrown away.
get yuorself a clue. http://www.mix-engineer.com/audio-philosophy/digital-vs-analog-recording/
Digital vs. Analog - Recording
When it comes to the recording process, analog gear will stay with us for a very long time. Even USB microphones have diaphragms and analog circuitry inside them. You obviously understand nothing.
this isn't about lossy compression, it's about digital versus analog.Yes and analogue is better, it might NOT be cheaper or smaller size or more convient but that not important in deciding which is best.
yes it does. It's called compressign the analogue data.Whisky-davenospam
People knew how shit MP3s are compared to an original recording that's why people use ACC and lossless to some it doesn;t matter of course.
there may be shit quality mp3s but that has nothing to do with digital versus analog.
there are also shit analog recordings too.there are shit recording yes, they are shit digital recordigns too. Ghe reason they are shit is because of low sampling rates, that is where ACC improved over MP3s if digital was best no one especally apple would have pushed for ACC or would use Loss-less or FLAC or any of the other formats which are better than MP3s and ACCs .
01/06/2016-
