Subject | Re: ISO value names are becoming ridiculous |
From | Sandman |
Date | 01/06/2016 16:26 (01/06/2016 16:26) |
Message-ID | <sandman-d4af97bf4006feb4cf3f1371db88decc@individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Peter Irwin |
Followups | Peter Irwin (44m) > Sandman |
SandmanPeter Irwin
So with the D5, it can boost its ISO to ISO 3,280,000, and suddenly how ISO is named is becoming just stupid. We should use EV steps instead:
It would be better to use Sv steps.
Ev is from the EVS system it means exposure value, and is the sum of Av (aperture value) and Tv (Time Value).
F/stop f/1 f/1.4 f/2 f/2.8 f/4 f/5.6 f/8 f/11 f/16 Av 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Speed 1 1/2 1/4 1/8 1/15 1/30 1/60 1/125 1/250 1/500 Tv 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Hence a exposure of 1/125 at f/16 has a Av of 8, a Tv of 7 and an exposure value of 15 (8+7).Exactly. That's the EV of the exposed image. After exposure, the camera can apply image amplification, called "ISO", so instead of taking EV15 and applying "ISO 400", we would take the EV15 image and apply "ISO EV+2", meaning that the resulting bitmap has a brightness that is equivalent to EV17, so it makes perfect sense.
This system has been in use since the 1950s. There was an expanded system proposed in the 1960s called APEX which also had light values (Lv) and film speed values (Sv) such that Sv + Lv = Av + Tv = Ev.Absolutely, and it made perfect sense, only it had a value of 0 at ISO 3, far below any used film and sensors used today. So it just makes more sense to reset it to ISO 100, otherwise it's the exact same thing.