Google| Subject | Re: nospam still hiding in the tall grass (was: The closest we'll get to nospam admitting to an erro |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 01/27/2016 00:33 (01/26/2016 18:33) |
| Message-ID | <260120161833453784%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
| Followups | Tony Cooper (3h & 18m) Whisky-dave (12h & 19m) > nospam |
In article <m3qfab9jle5oeatr2o7frd0t0hu8jeh73k@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:
Tony Cooperit tells me that people like you argue for the sake of arguing.
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:17:56 -0500, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:nospamTony Cooper
In article <sandman-f12291747b5170bad43609414f0728c1@individual.net>, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:nospami told you a reply is forthcoming and it is. the more you act like an asshole, the longer you are going wait.Sandman
Only, I'm not waiting - I *know* there will never be an answer. And I just find it funny to rub your nose in it.
you *hope* i don't answer. you have no way to know what i will or will not do.Sandmannospam
This is what you do - *ALWAYS*. There has been many many MANY threads where you have been proven 100% incorrect and your only course of action has been to abandon the thread. At no point have you ever gone "Oh right, I didn't think about that and got things mixed up, sorry about that".
nope.
there have been threads where people twist what i write into something i did't say and argue against that, or they take things out of context or they find a lone exception, thinking it disproves something, but it doesn't. they also turn it into a bash session rather than discuss the actual topic.
You seem to be the only person in this group who constantly says things that people twist, take out of context, find lone exceptions to, and get bashed repeatedly. Tell you anything?
they're focused on irrelevant things such as word usage or that i choose to not capitalize rather than the actual topic. they don't provide actual facts, they just say "you're wrong", expecting that is all it takes. laughable.
the only reason is because they don't have anything to refute and can *only* argue about stupid shit.
i've said film is dead. you've said no, it's not dead, film is still sold, therefore i'm wrong. something doesn't have to drop to zero to be considered dead. film sales are a tiny fraction of what they once were. kodak filed for bankruptcy. saying film is dead is not wrong.
i've said vinyl records cannot beat digital audio and film cannot beat digital photography and people start arguing that some people like vinyl records and some movie producers still use film. one has nothing to do with the other. people can like vinyl and film all they want but it's a mathematical impossibility for vinyl or film to beat their digital counterparts. it's simply not possible.
01/06/2016-
