Google| Subject | Re: nospam still not admitting to an error (was: The closest we'll get to nospam admitting to an err |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 01/24/2016 03:28 (01/24/2016 15:28) |
| Message-ID | <jed8abthsp5obu1c85dc4f66b5idehgqi4@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (7h & 19m) > Eric Stevens |
On 23 Jan 2016 09:54:34 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanThat's your opinion. What was made clear was that there are two ways of looking at the subject and I use the conventional method of going by the header setting out the thread topic. You go by the chain of references which most people never see. You are welcome to your method just as 'we' are welcome to ours. --
In article <mig5abdjtuoep0eln74jdkmik4jr0v30l6@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmanEric StevensnospamSandman
it has a different subject heading.
So?
As far as the reader is concerned, you have changed the subject and it's now a different thread.
This again, Eric? You got your ass handed to you last time via screen shots, RFC's and a multitude of links.
Regards,
Eric Stevens
01/06/2016-
