Subject | Re: nospam still not admitting to an error (was: The closest we'll get to nospam admitting to an err |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 01/23/2016 01:00 (01/23/2016 13:00) |
Message-ID | <mig5abdjtuoep0eln74jdkmik4jr0v30l6@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (9h & 54m) > Eric Stevens |
SandmanAs far as the reader is concerned, you have changed the subject and it's now a different thread. --
In article <220120161738208686%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam wrote:SandmannospamIt's funny how he was eager to respond promptly while he still thought he was correct:nospam
what's funny is how insecure you are about your claims that you started yet another thread solely to attack me.i'll reply when i want and not before then.Sandman
I know you won't reply because you lack the capacity to admit to having made an error.
a reply is forthcoming and i'm *not* in error
Haha! I won't be holding my breath :)nospamSandman
however, i have other things to do than argue with you.
Funny, you had no problem "arguing" with me as long as you thought you were correct. :-DSandmanAnd I didn't start "another thread". This is still the same thread.nospam
it has a different subject heading.
So?