Google| Subject | Re: nospam still not admitting to an error (was: The closest we'll get to nospam admitting to an err |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 01/23/2016 00:59 (01/23/2016 12:59) |
| Message-ID | <ahg5abh31dvfbfunumi6khtv4f9s4vg26j@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (9h & 56m) |
On 22 Jan 2016 21:52:48 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanSubject to a particular definition of thread. --
In article <220120161540505700%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam wrote:It's funny how he was eager to respond promptly while he still thought he was correct:nospam
what's funny is how insecure you are about your claims that you started yet another thread solely to attack me.i'll reply when i want and not before then.Sandman
I know you won't reply because you lack the capacity to admit to having made an error.
And I didn't start "another thread". This is still the same thread.
Regards,
Eric Stevens
01/06/2016-
