Subject | Re: The closest we'll get to nospam admitting to an error (was: ISO value names are becoming ridicul |
From | nospam |
Date | 01/13/2016 04:12 (01/12/2016 22:12) |
Message-ID | <120120162212430039%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (9h & 1m) |
Sandmani'm still waiting for you to answer the questions i asked. feel free to do so before i post the responses.
I am eager to read your reply to see you admit to making numerous incorrect statements, apologizing for your sarcastic and inflammatory remarks and pointing some minor detail you may have gotten correct in one message.
Chances are bigger that you'll deflect, ignore the topic and claim victory based on something incredibly minor that you did get correct which turns out wasn't even in contradiction to something I've said, all the while not acknowledging that you were incorrect and has been proven wrong. :-Dyou didn't prove anything wrong. what you did was intentionally confuse the issue and hope nobody noticed.