Skip to main content
news

Re: ISO value names are bec...

nospam
SubjectRe: ISO value names are becoming ridiculous
Fromnospam
Date01/06/2016 18:23 (01/06/2016 12:23)
Message-ID<060120161223551446%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsWhisky-dave

In article <7377ee44-0525-4ed2-a362-5169e49aa8a5@googlegroups.com>, Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>wrote:

Sandman
So with the D5, it can boost its ISO to ISO 3,280,000, and suddenly how ISO is named is becoming just stupid. We should use EV steps instead:

Whisky-dave
SO why start at -1 ?

Sandman
The base would be what is today called ISO 100, which corresponds to an expected brightness level of the resulting bitmap image.

Whisky-dave
Why limit it to bitmaps?

Sandman
Because ISO is film sensitivity and sensor amplification, so it's only a variable for the resulting image.

Whisky-dave
which might not be a bitmap image BMP. It'sz got nothing to do with sensor amplification eithert.

here we go again.