Subject | Re: ISO value names are becoming ridiculous |
From | nospam |
Date | 01/06/2016 18:23 (01/06/2016 12:23) |
Message-ID | <060120161223551446%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Whisky-dave |
here we go again.Whisky-daveSandmanWhisky-daveSandmanSandmanWhisky-dave
So with the D5, it can boost its ISO to ISO 3,280,000, and suddenly how ISO is named is becoming just stupid. We should use EV steps instead:
SO why start at -1 ?
The base would be what is today called ISO 100, which corresponds to an expected brightness level of the resulting bitmap image.
Why limit it to bitmaps?
Because ISO is film sensitivity and sensor amplification, so it's only a variable for the resulting image.
which might not be a bitmap image BMP. It'sz got nothing to do with sensor amplification eithert.